Prison Models Essay Sample free essay sample

There are three theoretical accounts of prisons that have been outstanding in American since the early 1940’s: custodial. rehabilitative. and reintegration. Each theoretical account is designed otherwise based on its overruling end. and this affects the physical design. policies. and plans that are implemented within each of the theoretical accounts. Custodial ModelArchaic Purpose: Control. focal point is on keeping security and order. Goal: Punishment. this is the best manner to supply disincentive against future offense. Focus: Prisoners must be punished for their errors and prison life must be made so unpleasant so that wrongdoers will waver to perpetrate any new offenses upon release. Theory: Classical. belief that humans operate under free will and an wrongdoer makes a pick to prosecute in condemnable behaviour believing benefits outweigh the costs. Design: Radial. this allows for captives to hold less contact with each other and allows for guards to supervise more captives at one clip. We will write a custom essay sample on Prison Models Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Management Style: Military manner attack is used to command captives. Focus is on subject and order with a clear and steadfast hierarchy of who is in charge. The determination procedure is left to the disposal and the inmates are expected to be obedient and follow all the regulations without oppugning. Administrative Style: Control theoretical account. authorization is the custodies of the prison disposal. Prison decision makers are inflexible and supply strict control over inmates’ lives. Communication is formal and professional and is restricted to official channels and must follow a formal concatenation of bid. Advantages: Good control. gives public feeling of safety and requital. tight security against flights. Disadvantages: Inhumane intervention of captives. creates high tensenesss and violent atmosphere. enhances likeliness of public violences. Rehabilitative ModelModern Purpose: Rehabilitate Goal: Treatment Focus: Determining what caused the captive to perpetrate the offense so that they can be treated and rehabilitated. If an wrongdoer receives the proper medical and psychological attention they will be â€Å"cured† of their criminalism. Theory: Positivism. belief that offense is caused or determined by psychological factors or biological lacks and these can be diagnosed and treated by scientific agencies ; thought that an wrongdoers actions are out of their control. Design: Courtyard. this allows captives to hold every bit much â€Å"fresh air† as possible which is known to hold many medical and psychological benefits. Management Manner: Hospital. prison staff has more professional preparation. and captives are treated as patients. Use benevolent authorization to constructively alter inmates from violent antisocial felons to good citizens. There is a clear and orderly concatenation of bid. but inmates are encourages to be involved in their attention. Inmates are non involved in any determination devising procedures. and have no signifiers of self-governing. Administrative Manner: Consensual theoretical account. less restrictive correctional environment. Communication is both formal and informal. Situations covering with inmates demands are formal while twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours interactions with inmates are less formal. Open communicating is encouraged. The inmates are allowed to oppugn their intervention options but the prison staff and disposal has the authorization to do all of the determinations. Advantages: Lower recidivism rates. more humane. captives can acquire aid may non hold otherwise been able to acquire. Disadvantages: More expensive. easier for flights. intervention can be uneffective. Reintegration ModelProgressive Purpose: Reintegrate Goal: Education Focus: Prisoners should be given every opportunity to larn duty and good citizenship by offering a assortment of instruction plans and helping with re-entry into society such as happening lodging and occupations. Theory: Social disorganisation. a deficiency of instruction and resources causes community societal controls have broken down doing a condemnable civilization to emerge. By supplying an instruction and apportioning the proper resources to inmates to re-enter these communities. you are battling the forces that keep communities disorganized. Wrongdoers will larn new ways and have better resources and will non look to reappear into the condemnable civilization they came from. Design: Campus. this allows for a more college-like ambiance so inmates can concentrate on instruction. larning new accomplishments. and how to accommodate back into society. Management Manner: Academic. prison staff and disposal are at that place to learn and steer inmates on the accomplishments and resources needed to reintegrate into society. It is up to the inmate to take advantage of services and plans offered. Inmates are allowed to take an active function in the determination devising procedure. and are encouraged to inquiry procedures and processs. Inmates openly and freely show their sentiments. Administrative Manner: Responsibility Model. prison disposal maintains order by puting restrictions but inmates are allowed to self-govern within the restricted environment. Communication is informal and inmates are allowed initiate conversations which encourages a more societal scene Advantages: Inexpensive. Fosters inmate self-respect. Teachs duty. Disadvantages: System can be abused easy. small control. inability to mensurate effectivity. Mentions Clark. D. N. ( 2004. 08 09 ) . Reintegration or recidivism of released individuals. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //fcwpp. Friend. org/reintegration A ; recidivism paper. pdf Gaines. L. K. . A ; Miller. R. L. ( 2013 ) . Condemnable justness in action. ( 7th ed. ) . Belmont. Calcium: Wadsworth Cengage Learning Salinas. G. L. ( 2009 ) . A preliminary analysis: Prison theoretical accounts and prison direction theoretical accounts and the Texas prison system. ( Unpublished master’s thesis. Texas State University ) Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //digital. library. txstate. edu/bitstream/handle/10877/3639/fulltext. pdf